Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:20:34AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org> writes:
>
> > I'm not saying the DFSG should not be applied to the GFDL; I'm saying
> > there's no clear consensus that the GFDL is non-free according to the
> > DFSG.
>
> Yes, there is. You keep saying this, but you don't actually address
> the issues. There is essentially universal agreement that the GFDL
> includes several non-free provisions.
>
> If you want absolute unanimity, then you aren't going to get it; if
> you want a clear consensus, it does, in fact, exist. We have an
> engine for generating consensus (debian-legal); it has achieved
> consensus, and well, that's that.
debian-legal "consensus" is worth approximately all of the lint
currently residing in my belly button.
--
For every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you!
Reply to: