Re: How to handle libssl support?
Em Qui, 2004-11-11 às 13:17 -0500, Daniel Burrows escreveu:
> On Thursday 11 November 2004 10:45 am, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > It is not necessary. Look at fetchmail, for instance:
> > Replaces: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common
> > Provides: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common
> > Conflicts: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common, logcheck (<<
> > 1.1.1-9)
> > I don't know and didn't check for the others *-ssl packages, though.
> Yes, but if you have fetchmail-ssl installed and not fetchmail, an upgrade
> will not install fetchmail. It might result in fetchmail-ssl being removed
> (since the new fetchmail-common doesn't provide the version it needs), but
> unless some other part of the system depends on fetchmail, you won't end up
> with fetchmail installed.
I'm not sure about this. Wouldn't the Provides: fetchmail-ssl on
fetchmail satisfy fetchmail-common's relationship needs when upgrading
and, thus, be selected for instalation?
email@example.com: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov>
Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org>