Re: How to handle libssl support?
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:27:08AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Thursday 11 November 2004 04:11 am, Juergen Salk wrote:
> > It seems in Sarge at least some of the crypto crippled versions
> > have just vanished into thin air.
> ...which is going to silently leave users running old versions of some
> software. links-ssl seems to have been replaced with a dummy upgrade
> package, but other *-ssl packages (eg, fetchmail-ssl) were just dropped. It
> seems to me that any crypto-enhanced package that was moved to main and
> renamed should have a dummy upgrade package in sarge.
It is not necessary. Look at fetchmail, for instance:
Replaces: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common
Provides: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common
Conflicts: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common, logcheck (<< 1.1.1-9)
I don't know and didn't check for the others *-ssl packages, though.