also sprach Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com> [2004.10.10.2101 +0200]: > That bug was closed because it was _already fixed_ and the > submitter didn't check before filing it. I am sorry, Matt, but it was not fixed. You should have tagged the bug wontfix and leave it open. also sprach Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.10.10.2102 +0200]: > I explained this to you on IRC already. If using kernel-package, > the Debianization patches in user-mode-linux should be packaged as > a kernel patch, which would be used with make-kpkg. What, and then require to always add two patches because UML by itself produces buggy packages? No, this is not a solution if you ask me. You are packaging a kernel patch that has 'xterm' hardcoded in it. Debian's alternatives system exists specifically to address this problem. So please, use it. I do not see a single point why the UML kernel patch should be as pristine as possible. This is a minor modification required to properly integrate with Debian. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature