Re: proposal: 'xterm' alternatives entry
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:27:34PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:11:42PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Frank Lichtenheld <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.10.10.2005 +0200]:
> > > Wouldn't it be better to file bugs against the packages that don't
> > > use x-terminal-emulator?
> > What if those bugs get ignored? see: #275527
> Hmm, I don't know anything about how uml works but the answers seems
> to imply that fixing it in user-mode-linux suffices... But that's
> something you have to discuss with mdz and not with me.
That bug was closed because it was _already fixed_ and the submitter didn't
check before filing it.