On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:52:40AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Duncan Findlay > > | On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | > * martin f krafft > | > > | > | What do you think? > | > > | > API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well. > | > > | > Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my > | > system. Per child. > | > | Umm... I'd like to see that.... > > 7122 root 15 0 660m 332m 4692 D 0.0 43.8 8:18.64 spamd > 7123 nobody 15 0 287m 257m 4692 D 0.0 34.0 0:17.01 spamd > > | Furthermore, you should use the -m option to limit the number of > | children to something sane, like 5 or so. > > This is per child, as I wrote. A lot of that is shared, but not reported as such by top/ps due to changes in how the kernel reports shared memory. The kernel only reports memory that is used in shared libraries, I believe. More memory is shared between spamd and it's children. Other than that I don't know what to say. It doesn't seem like it should take up that much memory... FWIW, I can't really reproduce that. root 1525 0.0 1.2 27192 6696 ? - Oct05 0:00 /usr/sbin/spamd --create-prefs --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir -s local0 -d --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid root 1584 0.0 4.9 32944 25660 ? - Oct05 1:20 spamd child root 1585 0.0 5.0 34008 26168 ? - Oct05 1:25 spamd child root 1586 0.0 5.2 35172 26844 ? - Oct05 1:23 spamd child root 1587 0.0 4.9 32072 25332 ? - Oct05 1:46 spamd child root 1588 0.0 6.5 42180 33852 ? - Oct05 1:49 spamd child -- Duncan Findlay
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature