[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3



Duncan Findlay wrote, Wednesday, October 06, 2004 11:03 PM

> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:51:46PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
[...]
>>  And, BTW, since version 2.64 we have:
>>
>>     - Rules backported from 3.0.0
>>
>>  So though SA3 can make other things better (bayesian and so), SA2 is
>> not so obsolete, and basically *works* in machines in which SA3 won't.
>
> I'm not really sure what you mean by rules backported from
> 3.0.0. Unfortunately, rules are fairly linked to releases.

The above was a /direct/ quote from the 2.64-1 changelog:

spamassassin (2.64-1) unstable; urgency=high

  * New upstream release
    - Rules backported from 3.0.0
    - Problem on long headers fixed
    - Performance improvements
  * [SECURITY] Fixes a potential DoS attack, hence the urgency=high.

 -- Jesus Climent <jesus.climent@hispalinux.es>  Thu,  5 Aug 2004 08:50:17
+0300

Regards,

Adam



Reply to: