Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
Duncan Findlay wrote, Wednesday, October 06, 2004 11:03 PM
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:51:46PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
>> And, BTW, since version 2.64 we have:
>> - Rules backported from 3.0.0
>> So though SA3 can make other things better (bayesian and so), SA2 is
>> not so obsolete, and basically *works* in machines in which SA3 won't.
> I'm not really sure what you mean by rules backported from
> 3.0.0. Unfortunately, rules are fairly linked to releases.
The above was a /direct/ quote from the 2.64-1 changelog:
spamassassin (2.64-1) unstable; urgency=high
* New upstream release
- Rules backported from 3.0.0
- Problem on long headers fixed
- Performance improvements
* [SECURITY] Fixes a potential DoS attack, hence the urgency=high.
-- Jesus Climent <firstname.lastname@example.org> Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:50:17