Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:03:18PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > (And my "home server" is a AMD K6-II 450, with 192MB RAM, not bad for my
> > own amount of daily mail)
> Perhaps you simply need to tune the -m option. Spamassassin has
> switched to a preforking model (similar to apache) rather than a
> spawning option, so the number specified by -m should be decreased.
To '-m 1' ? Even that will be too much for SA3 to fit in 192MB of RAM;
and the throughput will be *bad*...
Even if SA3 has better ways to stop spam, that doesn't mean SA2 suddenly
stopped doing what it does. It's a trade-off people have to make; either
they buy bigger, larger, better servers to manage the incoming spam, or
they cope with more SPAM. Is it that hard to understand?
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
-- with thanks to fortune