Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:37:19AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > I'm not really sure what you mean by rules backported from
> > 3.0.0. Unfortunately, rules are fairly linked to releases.
>
> The above was a /direct/ quote from the 2.64-1 changelog:
>
> spamassassin (2.64-1) unstable; urgency=high
>
> * New upstream release
> - Rules backported from 3.0.0
> - Problem on long headers fixed
> - Performance improvements
> * [SECURITY] Fixes a potential DoS attack, hence the urgency=high.
>
> -- Jesus Climent <jesus.climent@hispalinux.es> Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:50:17
> +0300
And this is a /direct/ quote from the upstream SpamAssassin Changes file:
rules backported from 3.0.0 tree
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r22197 | striker | 2004-06-27 12:59:51 +0000 (Sun, 27 Jun 2004) | 5 lines
J
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.27|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
That's thirty minutes away. I'll be there in ten.
--Wolf (Pulp Fiction)
Reply to: