[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3

El mié, 06-10-2004 a las 08:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> >   b. provide a new version that can interface with spamassassin 3.
> Just for the record, current amavisd-new can talk to spamassassin 3, even if
> not perfectly (chroots needs some... tweaking).
> As for the bugs, go ahead. spamassassin 2 is pretty much useless, and
> anything that depends/recommends spamassassin and cannot keep up with it
> really needs to be booted off the archive (if it cannot be fixed fast
> enough).

 But the problem is that spamassassin 2 works in usual people MX systems
(which usually is your older desktop) while SA3 has a big problem in
that machines, making it unusable.

 And, BTW, since version 2.64 we have:
    - Rules backported from 3.0.0

 So though SA3 can make other things better (bayesian and so), SA2 is
not so obsolete, and basically *works* in machines in which SA3 won't.

(And my "home server" is a AMD K6-II 450, with 192MB RAM, not bad for my
own amount of daily mail)


Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente

Reply to: