Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:32:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> If this is not solved, we really should consider to re-introduce
> spamassassin 2 as spamassassin, and the version 3 as spamassassin3.
Or we should not consider it.
In such case 2.64 will become obsolete even faster than 2.20 did in woody,
since it is obsoleted by 3.x. Having 2.64 which is only worth having for the
bayessian methods is brainless since we have other bayesian tools for the
trick, some of them considered even more efficient: bogofilter, dspam,
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.27|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
I don't wanna hear old sad bastard music Barry, I just want something I can
--Rob (High Fidelity)