Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
* Francesco P. Lovergine (firstname.lastname@example.org) [041006 14:20]:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Spamassassin 3 is finally in unstable. Thanks to Duncan (and
> > possibly others involved)!
> Just for record, I and a few other people removed spamassassin 3 on
> my workstation due to performace problems. It is really a memory
> and cpu hog. I doubt it is usable as is on any box without
> a good deal of horsepower and memory. I would add at least
> a big warning in its NEWS file about this, until its problems will be
> not solved.
If this is not solved, we really should consider to re-introduce
spamassassin 2 as spamassassin, and the version 3 as spamassassin3.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C