[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Make a single source package for all mozilla-*-locale packages? (Was: [Re: Bug#273420: ITP: mozilla-firefox-locale-sv -- Mozilla Firefox Swedish Language/Region Package])



On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:03:49PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> I think, that this would not be too hard to implement. On the other
> hand, there would still be problems that some translations might not be
> ready if mozilla* packages become ready to go in. IMHO, doing so looks like
> a trick to declare translations not to be release critical and in fact
> inferior to normal packages.

That's hardly an issue, you just drop the translation (or ship an empty
translation) until such a time that there is one. Since you are building
all the translations from the same source it's easier to have them in sync 
with the mozilla packages so instead of:

1.- A new version of mozilla is uploaded to the archive
2.- New versions are uploaded to the archive, but not every package 
maintainer can cope up
3.- Mozilla cannot get into testing after the dealy because of 2)
4.- Somebody sends "uninstallable" RC bugs to sid because of 2)
5.- The packages that did not have an updated installation are removed from 
testing so that Mozilla can go in 

We could have:

1.- A new version of mozilla is uploaded
2.- A new version of the mozilla translations is uploaded
3.- Mozilla goes into testing after the delay (all translations are for the 
new version) together with the new version of mozilla-i18n and available 
translations.
4.- Updates to mozilla-i18n adding updated translations are moved into the 
archive

For some time (until all translations are updated) you have a version in 
sid and testing which do not include all translations but that's better 
than having RC bugs (in either mozilla or the translation) because of it 
not being up-to-date, after all, it _will_ be removed because of this in 
the future.

Regards

Javier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: