Le lundi 13 septembre 2004 à 15:40 +0200, Martin Schulze a écrit : > A while ago there was a discussion in which it was said that such > tools are rather useless (or even dangerous) if they don't get their > database updated in accordance with new viruses/security problems. > > Some of these systems are hence not suitable for a stable Debian > release where updates will only be made for security problems and > very important bugfixes. > > Have you thought about keeping these packages out of sarge or did you > develop a solution so that users can get their databases updated > outside of the stable Debian release? Speaking of stable updates, will you consider, for sarge point releases, accepting some new upstreams for large packages that are not supported otherwise, security-speaking? For example, will you accept new Mozilla upstreams? We have been shipping woody for a long time with mozilla packages containing known security holes, maybe we don't want this for sarge. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=