Re: Updating scanners and filters in Debian stable (3.1)
Jesus Climent wrote:
> I rather have a system with code (say SpamAssassin) which is being activelly
> developed and reviwed than code which is rottening, is useless but is
> considered stable by Debian.
As I questioned before, maybe such a package is not suited for a stable
release at all. Maybe it's better to provide such a package through
backports.org with easy means to update.
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer. -- Perl book
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.