Re: PROPOSAL - REFORMULATED - Create alternative Packages files for each section

To: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de>
Cc: debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL - REFORMULATED - Create alternative Packages files for each section
From: Daniel Ruoso <daniel@ruoso.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:29:30 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 1093634969.3566.22.camel@cedro>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040827184713.GS23664@freenet.de>
References: <[🔎] 1093561862.1485.46.camel@cedro> <[🔎] 20040827161622.GK23664@freenet.de> <[🔎] 20040827163113.GC8470@ucsd.edu> <[🔎] 20040827184713.GS23664@freenet.de>

Em Sex, 2004-08-27 às 15:47, Michelle Konzack escreveu:
> So a 486 with 64 MBytes can be realy fast. 
> The problem is ALWAYS the Memory...

That's why I made this proposal after all. I want to reduce the memory
usage while using apt or dselect.

daniel

Reply to:

References:
- PROPOSAL - REFORMULATED - Create alternative Packages files for each section
  - From: Daniel Ruoso <daniel@ruoso.com>
- Re: PROPOSAL - REFORMULATED - Create alternative Packages files for each section
  - From: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de>
- Re: PROPOSAL - REFORMULATED - Create alternative Packages files for each section
  - From: "John H. Robinson, IV" <jaqque@debian.org>
- Re: PROPOSAL - REFORMULATED - Create alternative Packages files for each section
  - From: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Incorrect use of "it's" in package control files -- file mass bug?
Next by Date: Testing netapplet
Previous by thread: Re: PROPOSAL - REFORMULATED - Create alternative Packages files for each section
Next by thread: Re: PROPOSAL - REFORMULATED - Create alternative Packages files for each section
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread