On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 05:02:10PM +0300, Kai Hendry wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:57:31PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote: > > On Thursday 19 August 2004 14:48, Kai Hendry wrote: > > > Urgh, questions. The user has to tell what apache they're using!? Are > > > you running apache, apache2, or apache-ssl? This sort of question must > > > be avoided. > > How can that question be avoided? You can have several of that apache's > > installed. Choose a random one? :P > > It would be great if whatever was at the filesystem location: > /web/mywebapp.example.com And the first package that goes over whatever I've got installed at /web/mywebapp.example.com, unless there's FHS approval for it, gets a HEOE. > Just got served from http://mywebapp.example.com But I want my shiny new webapp to be at example.com/mywebapp -- no, wait, make that vhost12.com/preproduction/mywebapp. > Btw I found nothing in the fhs about web stuff. You need to look harder. /srv is The Way Of The Future, apparently. > Web apps should not be dependent on apache, but just httpd. Riiiight. Is there any requirement for a package providing httpd to even *have* CGI capabilities? Once you give a complete API for managing the configuration of every httpd-providing package in the archive, let me know. - Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature