On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 02:00:52PM +0200, J?r?me Warnier wrote: > > Well, personally I wouldn't mind a more actively maintained esound; the > > current version in Debian is pretty old, and the later upstream versions > > fixes quite a lot of bugs. To be able to use esd on my laptops, I have > > created my own packages of v0.2.34 instead, but I would really prefer > > having a working package in the Debian archives... > I've done exactly the same thing[1] because ESD 0.2.29 with ALSA really > doesn't make it. That's nothing. I don't even *use* esd, but it still causes a segfault-on-startup in anything on my box linked to libesd (#244840, fixed months ago upstream, pending for three), and the only thing I can realistically do about it is to rebuild packages without libesd. This package is not maintained. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature