[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Advice with uncooperative maintainers

On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 02:00:52PM +0200, J?r?me Warnier wrote:
> > Well, personally I wouldn't mind a more actively maintained esound; the
> > current version in Debian is pretty old, and the later upstream versions
> > fixes quite a lot of bugs.  To be able to use esd on my laptops, I have
> > created my own packages of v0.2.34 instead, but I would really prefer
> > having a working package in the Debian archives...
> I've done exactly the same thing[1] because ESD 0.2.29 with ALSA really
> doesn't make it.

That's nothing. I don't even *use* esd, but it still causes a
segfault-on-startup in anything on my box linked to libesd (#244840,
fixed months ago upstream, pending for three), and the only thing I
can realistically do about it is to rebuild packages without libesd.

This package is not maintained.

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: