On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 09:30:33PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > You seem to be talking about the 'section' ordering done by the > autobuilders. Yes. > It is as you say 'more-or-less' build-depend order, but not quite. > And this could be improved. :) > > >> Is it also looking at the time since the upload, > > > > No. > > Perhaps it should. That would be a possible improvement too. :) Those two things could indeed be improved, yes. Unfortunately, though, not without major surgery to wanna-build. Usually, wanna-build copes just fine; it's just when there are upload spikes that there are troubles. And believe me, this is a /huge/ upload spike. No sane measures could have coped with this. > > http://people.debian.org/~wouter/wanna-build-states > > Thanks. I've read it, and notice several of the possible improvements > I've mentioned are not described there. Correct. > So it looks like there _are_ more things the autobuild maintainers can > try instead to "adding an insane amount of new buildd machines". I don't believe I said we can't do anything about it. I did say, though, that there was nothing we could do about it anymore /right now/, except for a) adding an insane amount of buildd machines, b) starting to do work on something which /might/ be finished in a few months (and therefore be too late to help out right now), or c) just sit and wait until the situation resolves itself. > And these improvements might even be useful after the release. :) Might be, but they'll not be finished before that time. And, really, you won't find me fiddling with infrastructure as crucial as the central wanna-build database when a release is near. I don't like to be lynched. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature