On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 13:02, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:31:04AM -0500, Alan Shutko wrote: > > Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> writes: > > > > > That's like complaining that mozilla has no dependency on apache. > > > > Not really. The most common way to use Xprint is with the Xprint > > server on the same machine. > > That's no excuse to break it for people who use the > network-transparent capabilities of X. These people do not need a > useless copy of Xprt installed on the wrong host. Hence, Recommends. If you want the print engine to be *ON* your machine go use Windows. I use X with one font server per lan, one print server per lan, most of the "work" is done from an xnest login to the main workhorse. Why then would you force me to run like Windows? I'm with Andrew on this one. Recommends. But make it a bit more clear as to why you need one somewhere. -- greg@gregfolkert.net REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part