On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 07 Jun 2004, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Considering that the real catastrophe is the current level of spam, I > > don't think we could agree on what exactly a catastrophe is. > > > > How about this? > > Is there any particular reason why people who want this level of > draconian spam protection on their own configure their MTAs and/or > MUAs to incorporate this level of spam termination? Why pump the crap around the net any more than necessary? regards Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature