On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 08:18, Eike "zyro" Sauer wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow schrieb: > > Can we agree that 100% free/DFSG does not extend to the existing > > neccessary legal documents (licenses) in debian and work from that to > > see what else should be handled more loosly so we get a working Debian > > that free where it matters (programs and their data and not legal > > texts)? > > I'd do it the other way and specify what should be free according > to the DFSoftwareG. > For some items it might be usefull to have another definition of > what is considered free. Like raster images (what is the preferred > form for modification?). 1) You want a definition of "source", not a definition of free. The Debian Free Software Guidelines, with human interpretation, are a definition of free. 2) The preferred form of modification for a raster image, is whatever form you use to modify it. No, really. It's that simple. For many images this is a PNG; for complex images, it's probably an XCF or PSD. If it comes off a digital camera, it's JPEG. Whatever form you prefer to modify it in, is the preferred form for modification. -- Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part