Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> E.g. /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2:
> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
> of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
> Thats clearly not DFSG free.
> And no, those files are not the license of the source they acomplish
> but stand on their own.
Nothing in base-files is GPL-licensed? Interesting. I'm sure some
Essential: yes package is, however, and those could be considered a minimum
lump, since they're not really separable in an installation.
I don't like it, of course.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.