Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification

["Eike \"zyro\" Sauer" <eikes@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

Goswin von Brederlow schrieb:
> Can we agree that 100% free/DFSG does not extend to the existing
> neccessary legal documents (licenses) in debian and work from that to
> see what else should be handled more loosly so we get a working Debian
> that free where it matters (programs and their data and not legal
> texts)?

I'd do it the other way and specify what should be free according
to the DFSoftwareG. 
For some items it might be usefull to have another definition of 
what is considered free. Like raster images (what is the preferred
form for modification?).

Ciao,
                Eike