Re: Social Contract GR's effect on sarge
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
I would respectfully suggest that other personalities beside Debian
devotees read these lists, in preparation for events such as server
compromises, and other proprietary O.S. marketing ploys. A little bit of
discretion, even in an open society, can be constructive, I think.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 01:21:38PM +0200, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
I have been contacted directly by several developers and have tried to
answer each of them with status updates that say more than I can say
publicly without risking compromising the progress of the
In fact, you told me last fall you weren't interested in having this
I see no reason the information should be dispersed only privately.
These negotiations are something that effect Debian as a whole, at least
from my point of view. Additionally, even with these discussions taking
place privately, I would think that in 6 months there would have been
something to report publicly.
Have discussion happened? Has any progress been made? Does it look
like we (Debian and the FSF) will be able to reach a resolution to the
noted problems with the GFDL?