Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
> I fail to see how the meaning of section 1 has changed. Even the
> release manager agreed that the previous meaning was the same, as he
> stated that the allowance for non-free documentation was just an
> exception for sarge. I understand the decision, but linking it with
> the GR is rather abusive. At least this change was editorial.
Oh, it is perfectly possible that that those proposing the change did
believe their change was only editorial, just rewriting the text the
way it was supposed to read. I just doubt that everyone agree that
the changes was not substantial.