Le lun 26/04/2004 à 11:35, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : > [Jochen Voss] > > By the way, what was the meaning of "editorial" in > > "Editorial changes to the Social Contract GR"? > > Normally, in a political vote, "editorial change" is used to get > people to believe that a controversial change isn't, giving a minority > a better chance to get their vote passed while no-one is looking. I fail to see how the meaning of section 1 has changed. Even the release manager agreed that the previous meaning was the same, as he stated that the allowance for non-free documentation was just an exception for sarge. I understand the decision, but linking it with the GR is rather abusive. At least this change was editorial. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=