[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

Le lun 26/04/2004 à 11:35, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> [Jochen Voss]
> > By the way, what was the meaning of "editorial" in
> > "Editorial changes to the Social Contract GR"?
> Normally, in a political vote, "editorial change" is used to get
> people to believe that a controversial change isn't, giving a minority
> a better chance to get their vote passed while no-one is looking.

I fail to see how the meaning of section 1 has changed. Even the release
manager agreed that the previous meaning was the same, as he stated that
the allowance for non-free documentation was just an exception for
sarge. I understand the decision, but linking it with the GR is rather
abusive. At least this change was editorial.
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss@debian.org
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=

Reply to: