Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:50:42 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> said:
> [Josselin Mouette]
>> I fail to see how the meaning of section 1 has changed. Even the
>> release manager agreed that the previous meaning was the same, as
>> he stated that the allowance for non-free documentation was just an
>> exception for sarge. I understand the decision, but linking it with
>> the GR is rather abusive. At least this change was editorial.
> Oh, it is perfectly possible that that those proposing the change
> did believe their change was only editorial, just rewriting the text
> the way it was supposed to read. I just doubt that everyone agree
> that the changes was not substantial.
Not very many of these people cared enough to make their views
known, in that case.
manoj
--
Acting is not very hard. The most important things are to be able to
laugh and cry. If I have to cry, I think of my sex life. And if I
have to laugh, well, I think of my sex life. Glenda Jackson
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: