Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:50:42 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> [Josselin Mouette]
>> I fail to see how the meaning of section 1 has changed. Even the
>> release manager agreed that the previous meaning was the same, as
>> he stated that the allowance for non-free documentation was just an
>> exception for sarge. I understand the decision, but linking it with
>> the GR is rather abusive. At least this change was editorial.
> Oh, it is perfectly possible that that those proposing the change
> did believe their change was only editorial, just rewriting the text
> the way it was supposed to read. I just doubt that everyone agree
> that the changes was not substantial.
Not very many of these people cared enough to make their views
known, in that case.
Acting is not very hard. The most important things are to be able to
laugh and cry. If I have to cry, I think of my sex life. And if I
have to laugh, well, I think of my sex life. Glenda Jackson
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C