Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
Number Six dijo [Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:27:08AM -0800]:
> > > It is much more convenient for me to launch 'pim c' instead of 'tupim c'
> > > -- 2 fewer keystrokes.
> >
> > There are a wide variety of ways for you to achieve the same result without
> > using the very generic name 'pim' for the name of the program.
>
> Okay, I'm convinced -- I'll leave it out. Are there "debian-standard"
> ways to do this sort of thing? All I can think of is provide a sample
> shell script in examples and tell people to source it. Come to think of
> it, if that's good enough for Blackdown's Java to setup the CLASSPATH,
> it's good enough for me.
We had a recent bug report regarding alternatives to telling people to
source a shell script - Take a look at #238592 if you are interested
in a little extra discussion.
Greetings,
--
Gunnar Wolf - gwolf@gwolf.cx - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
Reply to: