Re: spam closes Debian bugs!
Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote:
> Julian Mehnle <lists@mehnle.net> wrote:
>> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> > So, to start over, I'll just ask: So what? Where's the problem
>>> > with not being able to *control* bug reports from *everywhere*?
>
>>> It limits the locations I can do Debian work from and makes
>>> interacting with the BTS more work.
>
>> Not necessarily. You could carry your private key with you on a USB
>> key. Or whatever.
>
> Signing mails is work.
Then you clearly use broken tools. I'm sorry but with all the mailers
I know, signing a mail is just clicking on a button or typing a
shortcut, and then typing the passphrase.
> I am not short sighted either, which is why I have not said "we may
> not force signing ever in a gazilllion years because *currently* the
> benefit is minimal" but "...not force signing *now* because
> *currently*...".
>
> Fix the problem once it exist.
It already happened that a bug report was closed by a spam. So the
problem does exists, you cant deny it. What you can say it that you are
questioning the importance of the issue.
--
Mathieu Roy
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ |
| Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ |
| Not a native english speaker: |
| http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: