Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:20:36PM +0000, Will Newton wrote:
> On Thursday 19 Feb 2004 8:25 pm, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Well, if you've seen Eray: He was approved by his AM, but rejected
> > by the DAM, and I consider the DAM to be _absolutly_ right on
> > rejecting Eray.
> You may consider that, his AM may consider the opposite. Maybe you are
> right, maybe the AM was right. We'll probably never know. The fact is,
> the way Eray was handled caused a lot of noise (a lot like the current
> threads) and distraction from the core activities of Debian.
As, indeed, did Eray himself, long before he was rejected by the DAM.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]