Re: Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility
From: Cameron Patrick <cameron@patrick.wattle.id.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:41:08 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040107174108.GA12989@patrick.wattle.id.au>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040107134415.GA5777@patrick.wattle.id.au>
References: <[🔎] 20040107035549.GA2579@daedalus.andrew.net.au> <[🔎] 20040107132543.GA3667@web08.manitu.net> <[🔎] 20040107134415.GA5777@patrick.wattle.id.au>

Cameron Patrick wrote:

| But preferably only ever on an upgrade, and certainly never if you're
| running a 2.6 kernel.

Argh, WTF was I thinking here?  I think I must have thought this was
about i2c/lm-sensors incompatibility.  *runs away and hides*

Cameron.

Reply to:

References:
- Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility
  - From: Andrew Pollock <debian-lists-2004@andrew.net.au>
- Re: Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility
  - From: Martin Pitt <martin@piware.de>
- Re: Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility
  - From: Cameron Patrick <cameron@patrick.wattle.id.au>

Prev by Date: Re: apt-listchanges (Re: Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility)
Next by Date: Uw mail naar wouter.verhelst@advalvas.be/Your message to wouter.verhelst@advalvas.be
Previous by thread: Re: Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility
Next by thread: Re: Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread