On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:22:43PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:14:23PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > You are ignoring all the packages that don't build and never have been > > build for some architecture. Mainly that happens if some > > build-depends, like the compiler needed, wasn't yet ported. > If an architecture is that far from being able to build a package, we > should probably seriously reconsider supporting it in unstable. There > needs to be some baseline measurement that an architecture needs to > reach before we can consider it a part of the distribution. I don't think he specified *C* compiler. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature