[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Package which uses jam (instead make)

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:07:02 +0100, Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr> said: 

> On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 08:37:25AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>> > 	Bzzzt. It is documented to be a Makefile. That _is_ the
>> >  interface definition.
>> Out of curiosity, could you define "Makefile"? The standard I know
>> of for Makefiles is at:
>> <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/utilities/make.html>
>> Is that the standard Policy refers to?

> Given the earliest copyright of 2001, that's quite definitely not
> something the original writer referenced :)

	The single UNIX spec that is referred to above is a derivation
 of the POSIX spec, which far predates the Debian policy (it also
 predates Linux, but that is besides the point).

Get in touch with your feelings of hostility against the dying
light. Dylan Thomas [paraphrased periphrastically]
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: