Re: Package which uses jam (instead make)
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 14:57:34 +0200, Josip Rodin <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 04:00:19PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
>> > > You aren't trying to make debian/rules a jam script are you?
>> > Even if he was, that would be fine if he knew how to do it
>> > properly.
>> Policy 4.8:
>> This file must be an executable makefile, and contains the
>> package-specific recipes for compiling the package and building
>> binary package(s) from the source.
>> There was a lot of discussion of this some years ago (possibly in
>> relationship to shoop?). I don't remember why we don't allow
>> anything that meets the expected interface.
> Because we're fools. :)
We would be even more foolish to yank out a published
interface to our build system.
> The "must" in the new meaning is an accidental byproduct of
> conversion to the new language.
Accidental or not, it has been an established part of the
infrastructure for the whole life of ./debian/rules convention; and
ought not to be easy ro change.
"The light that burns twice as bright lasts half as long, and you have
burned so very, very bright, Roy!" Doctor Eldon Tyrell, in Blade
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C