Re: status of Progeny projects

To: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: status of Progeny projects
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:05:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1067436323.1820.467.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031029064613.GG9523@grep.be>
References: <[🔎] 1067024755.2089.55.camel@roadrunner> <[🔎] 20031026085408.GA1214@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> <[🔎] E1ADhZl-000545-3t@mid.downhill.at.eu.org> <[🔎] 20031027090200.GA14787@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> <[🔎] 1067264063.3260.25.camel@descent.netsplit.com> <[🔎] 20031027143622.GA9587@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> <[🔎] 20031028162843.A36346@bolthole.com> <[🔎] 20031029064613.GG9523@grep.be>

I would like to thank Ian Murdock for undertaking to keep
the Debian community informed of work going on at Progeny.
This, and the projects themselves, can only be helpful.
I am particularly pleased to hear about the grand APT
unification effort.

-- 
Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>

Reply to:

References:
- status of Progeny projects
  - From: Ian Murdock <imurdock@progeny.com>
- Re: status of Progeny projects
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>
- Re: status of Progeny projects
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
- Re: status of Progeny projects
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>
- Re: status of Progeny projects
  - From: Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
- Re: status of Progeny projects
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>
- Re: status of Progeny projects
  - From: Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com>
- Re: status of Progeny projects
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>

Prev by Date: Alternatives entries for postscript/pdf-viewer
Next by Date: Re: netkit-inetd in sarge
Previous by thread: Re: status of Progeny projects
Next by thread: Re: status of Progeny projects
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread