On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:28:43PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:36:22PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > ... > > If the debian-installer would have been developed further, this would > > not be a problem at all. However, Debian is struggling with the > > debian-installer for several years now and it still is quite away from > > being a usable installer for all stable architectures. > > > > So it's been under development/in use for several years, and it still isnt > really "usable"? > > sounds like a pretty good rationale for moving to anaconda, to me. Neither is anaconda, which has already been stated numerous times... The last time I checked, which was around 7 months ago, d-i was plenty usable on i386 already. However, getting either anaconda or d-i working on all 11 archs takes a lot more work than that. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature