[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: status of Progeny projects

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:28:43PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:36:22PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > ...
> > If the debian-installer would have been developed further, this would
> > not be a problem at all.  However, Debian is struggling with the
> > debian-installer for several years now and it still is quite away from
> > being a usable installer for all stable architectures.
> > 
> So it's been under development/in use for several years, and it still isnt
> really "usable"?
> sounds like a pretty good rationale for moving to anaconda, to me.

Neither is anaconda, which has already been stated numerous times... The
last time I checked, which was around 7 months ago, d-i was plenty usable
on i386 already. However, getting either anaconda or d-i working on all
11 archs takes a lot more work than that.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: