On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 08:09:59PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Gram writes: > > I generally think it is good practice to close bugs after a given > > amount of time (I would wait more than two weeks though), especially > > if the bug cannot be reproduced and nobody else has provided > > additional information. > > I don't see why a bug which can be reproduced and has not been fixed > should ever be closed. It doesn't stop being a bug just by getting > old. If the bug *can be* reproduced, it should definitely not be closed. I agree with you on this point. However, if the maintainer *cannot* reproduce it, and nobody has provided any useful information on how to do so, I feel the bug can be closed after a given amount of time. This is what I originally said. -- gram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature