Re: search-citeseer_0.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:32:11PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Policy is not everything that counts. Just because policy doesnt say
> > something it means it is good to do it.
> Of course but I think if the developper did something is because he
> think this is better and this should be respected (if doesn't broke
> the policy)
Respected, certainly. Accepted without question? Certainly not.
> More or less. Doesn't make sense include a depends of Emacs in
> search-citeseer and the -el part depends of this. The better option is
> split in two package each with your depends and needs.
> The sugestion of James is not right to include emacs like a suggets is
> not good since the package need emacsen to work.
This is exactly what Recommends and Suggests are for.