[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: search-citeseer_0.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED



On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:32:11PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:

> Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> writes:
> > Policy is not everything that counts. Just because policy doesnt say
> > something it means it is good to do it.
> 
> Of course but I think if the developper did something is because he
> think this is better and this should be respected (if doesn't broke
> the policy)

Respected, certainly.  Accepted without question?  Certainly not.

> More or less. Doesn't make sense include a depends of Emacs in
> search-citeseer and the -el part depends of this. The better option is
> split in two package each with your depends and needs.
>
> The sugestion of James is not right to include emacs like a suggets is
> not good since the package need emacsen to work.

This is exactly what Recommends and Suggests are for.

-- 
 - mdz



Reply to: