Re: Virus emails

[Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr>]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:37:03AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Runs spamc twice. Usually it won't matter, but with higher traffic, the load
> > will increase for obvious reasons...
> 
>     spamc isn't run twice.  exiscan-acl *can* run the mail through SA as a
> test.  It doesn't /have/ to.  So if one is using sa-exim one just does not
> have exiscan-acl check SA.

That's not how I interpreted what you said:

> It's generally accepted that for robust handling of Spam SA-Exim is the
> better route.  For simple handling as well as virus scanning Exiscan-ACL
> is the better route.  Lots of people just use both.

I thought you meant both as in both Exiscan-ACL and SA-Exim.

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.