Re: Virus emails
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:37:03AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Runs spamc twice. Usually it won't matter, but with higher traffic, the load
> > will increase for obvious reasons...
> spamc isn't run twice. exiscan-acl *can* run the mail through SA as a
> test. It doesn't /have/ to. So if one is using sa-exim one just does not
> have exiscan-acl check SA.
That's not how I interpreted what you said:
> It's generally accepted that for robust handling of Spam SA-Exim is the
> better route. For simple handling as well as virus scanning Exiscan-ACL
> is the better route. Lots of people just use both.
I thought you meant both as in both Exiscan-ACL and SA-Exim.
2. That which causes joy or happiness.