On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:07:46 +0200
Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:43:30AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Same here though I am sticking with SA-Exim because it saves the mail
> > in a certain range so I can throw it at the Bayesian classifier.
> I usually don't have large enough partitions to hold all the spam (!)
Certain range. Here it is things scored between 5 and 8. 5 is where
things are considered spam. 8 is where I reject things outright. 12 is where
autolearn is set. I want to send things in that range to the Bayesian
classifier so the score would creep up hopefully to the point of being
rejected. Comes out to about 1-2 a day.
> > It also has the option of teergrubing.
> I'm a bit scared of turning it on, didn't (see|read) enough documentation
> for it.
Simple concept, if a message scores high enough (25 is default) you just
string the connection out for 5 minutes.
> > It's generally accepted that for robust handling of Spam SA-Exim is the
> > better route. For simple handling as well as virus scanning Exiscan-ACL
> > is the better route. Lots of people just use both.
> Isn't that pretty wasteful?
Depends on what you consider wasteful.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpgU4uA_NEUL.pgp
Description: PGP signature