Re: Virus emails

[Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr>]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:43:30AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > For now I'm using the SA-Exim method because even though it's clumsy (needs
> > the .so file compiled from source so distribution isn't as trivial as an
> > apt-get invocation), I used it before the Exiscan patch was available and it
> > was reliable. (I'd welcome suggestions from other users about this issue.)
> 
>     Same here though I am sticking with SA-Exim because it saves the mail
> in a certain range so I can throw it at the Bayesian classifier.

I usually don't have large enough partitions to hold all the spam (!)

> It also has the option of teergrubing.

I'm a bit scared of turning it on, didn't (see|read) enough documentation
for it.

> It's generally accepted that for robust handling of Spam SA-Exim is the
> better route.  For simple handling as well as virus scanning Exiscan-ACL
> is the better route.  Lots of people just use both.

Isn't that pretty wasteful?

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.