[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Done (was Re: [mass bug filing?] Short descriptions being used as long descriptions and other policy violations)

On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:54:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm with you. Probably a large percentage of the packages that got bugs
> deserved them, but that's no excuse for bothering the ones that didn't.

Sorry for that, see below.

> And if the goal was to actually improve descriptions, rather than just
> inflating the number of bugs in the BTS, then putting a human in between
> the grep and the mail parts of the script, and adding some suggested
> improvements to the top of the bug reports would have been much more
> effective.

Well, I'm doing so right now, I will start from the first bug file until 
the last one and either provide what might be, IMHO, a better description 
or close them if they were filed incorrectly. I sure have a lot of work to 
do now ammending (sp?) for my mistakes.



Attachment: pgpjQULhKIotr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: