Re: Packages file under version control
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:10:24PM +1200, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 13:59, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> > If we put the Packages file under some sort of version control (e.g.
> > cvs), bandwidth requirments would be minimised as cvs automatically
> > takes care of diff's and patching, and i assume the CPU load from cvs
> > server is a lot better than rsync.
> You could use cvsup rather than cvs to reduce load further. But
> ideally you'd just use rsync and make the gzip using --rysncable...
> However, given the packages.gz file is much smaller than the total
> files being downloaded, is it really worth it?
When the mirrors sync, yes, when the average user runs
# apt-get update
# apt-get -u upgrade
No. Fetching Packages.gz over modem is a pain in the arse. Having it
only rsync the changes would be so nice.
o/~ It would be so nice, it would be so nice o/~
o/~ It would be so nice to meet some time o/~
Five brownie points to the first to guess the artist...