(Sorry for taking so long to get back) On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 08:28, Darren Salt wrote: > Hmm. They're conffiles (not sure why, given that they're all binaries); have > you tried 2.4 with the 2.3 drums files? I believe I tried that, but I can't recall. As it stands now, I just keep the source to 2.3 around for safekeeping. > I use it from time to time, and I think that it should be left in the archive > until most people are using 2.6-series kernels (and, thus, ALSA). Ah, I've been lax; I haven't even moved to ALSA yet. Does it do good MIDI? > I have an SBLive; it has an on-board synth, which sounds almost as good as > timidity (and has the advantage of using next to no CPU power). Odd, my current SBLive (bought about a month ago) doesn't seem to have on board synth. Even so, if it only sounds "almost as good as" timidity, that's pretty piss poor. > OTOH, the only synth support for emu10k1 is in ALSA, although there's OSS > support for the MIDI port on these cards (but I don't have anything to plug > in there). That would explain why I can't use synth on mine. > Hmm... another reason to keep it, then. Like I've said, I've got the source, I'm not too concerned, but I don't have the time to maintain a package for it. > A text editor :-) Yeah, I like vim, but sometimes I just like to have a reassurance that I haven't missed anything. -- The more I use other operating systems, the more I like Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org http://www.linux.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part