Re: "testing" improvements
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:48:28PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> En r?ponse ? Matt Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > What is your point exactly? That people use testing to get newer
> > packages,
> > so we should force newer packages into testing despite its purpose?
> Force packages into testing? You must have missed the point.
> I said let packages into testing for architectures where nothing
> prevent them to. Why would mipsel failures block x86 packages,
> for instance?
Because testing is meant to be releasable, and releasing with packages out
of sync across architectures is insane?