[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "testing" improvements

En réponse à Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>:

> > I'm sorry but most people that want recent versions of packages
> > in a more stable state use testing, not unstable. These are facts,
> > not theory. Since, testing is a pre-stable release it has to be
> > tested even more than unstable, because what's going to be on CDs
> > is testing not unstable.
> What is your point exactly?  That people use testing to get newer
> packages,
> so we should force newer packages into testing despite its purpose?

Force packages into testing? You must have missed the point.
I said let packages into testing for architectures where nothing
prevent them to. Why would mipsel failures block x86 packages,
for instance?

Jérôme Marant <jerome@marant.org>


Reply to: