On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:54:23PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > I second that proposition. Keeping m68k in a releasable state is > > becoming more and more a hassle, and it could be even worse for stable > > than it is for testing: imagine some security fix needs a rebuilt that > > takes a week, will we have to wait for a week to get the DSA ? > Probably stating the obvious, but - if all m68k machines are that slow > for building debian, has anybody looked at cross-compiling as a viable > alternative? Or are packages generally not cross-compile proof? > If that's the case, wouldn't it still be worth the effort for the truly > big ones such as GCC, X and Glibc? Er... we're not using cross-compiling anywhere in our infrastructure today, and you want to start by using it on the compiler itself? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpycABZx3hgb.pgp
Description: PGP signature