Le ven 07/02/2003 à 11:52, Marco d'Itri a écrit : > There another obvious solution: if an architecture has not enough > developers to care for its packages then it should be removed from > testing so it will not stop progress on the architectures which actually > matter to users. > If the situation will get better later they can be added again. I second that proposition. Keeping m68k in a releasable state is becoming more and more a hassle, and it could be even worse for stable than it is for testing: imagine some security fix needs a rebuilt that takes a week, will we have to wait for a week to get the DSA ? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature