Re: C++ transition stumbling blocks?

To: debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: C++ transition stumbling blocks?
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:20:04 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 87adht6cjv.wl@atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp.doshisha.ac.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030121192814.GN12585@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] 3E2CEB13.7060608@bigfoot.com> <[🔎] 87fzrneylx.wl@atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp.doshisha.ac.jp> <[🔎] 87el77eyfa.wl@atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp.doshisha.ac.jp> <[🔎] 873cnm320w.wl@vivare.dancer.pr.jp.doshisha.ac.jp> <[🔎] 20030121192814.GN12585@deadbeast.net>

> > and X is confused with usage of virtual package name "libgl1".
> 
> Confused how?

Correction: I was confused with how virtual package name 
libgl1 is going to be used in the future  :)



regards,
	junichi

Reply to:

References:
- more and more broken packages?
  - From: Erik Steffl <steffl@bigfoot.com>
- Re: more and more broken packages?
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Re: more and more broken packages?
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- C++ transition stumbling blocks?
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Re: C++ transition stumbling blocks?
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Open Source Games and Cheating - a paradoxum?
Next by Date: Re: policy for new kernel-images (e.g. RTAI)
Previous by thread: Re: C++ transition stumbling blocks?
Next by thread: Re: C++ transition stumbling blocks?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread